US State Department Flags “Backsliding” on Free Speech in Latest Rights Report
By Fidelis News Staff | 13 August 2025
The U.S. State Department’s newly released 2024 Human Rights Practices report raises concerns over the UK’s civil liberties, notably pointing to “specific areas of concern” around free speech, while also reflecting a notable shift in how human rights are framed in US foreign policy.
Main Free Speech Concerns Raised
- The report states that while free speech is “generally provided for”, it highlights restrictions imposed by “safe access zones” near abortion clinics, including cases where silent prayer or posting signs have led to arrests.
- Critics say the UK’s Online Safety Act has chilled online discussion, particularly around the Southport attack, where authorities were accused of intervening to suppress speech. Read our full report on the Online Safety Act here.
- Overall, the report concludes that human rights in the UK “worsened” in 2024, including growing concern over antisemitic threats following the October Hamas-Israel conflict.
Wider Context: Report Restructured for Political Priorities
This year’s report reflects a broader reorientation under Secretary of State Marco Rubio. Critics argue it excludes thorough coverage of issues like gender-based violence, LGBTQ+ rights, and the humanitarian crisis in Gaza, especially compared to prior editions.
The shift comes amid significant staffing cuts within the State Department’s human rights bureaus, casting doubt on institutional independence. Supporters argue the report is streamlined and aligned with the new administration’s legislative priorities.
Responses and Reactions
- UK Government: A spokesperson said, “Free speech is vital … we are proud to uphold freedoms whilst keeping our citizens safe.”
- US Vice President JD Vance echoed the report’s findings during a visit, warning of threats to religious and political dissent rights.
Digging Deeper
While free speech remains formally protected in the UK, the focus on public space restrictions, online regulation, and state responses to sensitive events like Southport indicate growing tension between liberty and safety. The report’s restructuring has sparked debate on whether U.S. rights diplomacy is being guided by ideology or evidence.
Fidelis News is free to read — but not free to make.
Support independent journalism via Buy Me a Coffee
